Mississippi State Lost 56–23, Yet Kalen DeBoer Gave the Bulldogs Credit for Exposing a Problem Alabama Can’t Afford to Ignore…
A 56–23 scoreline usually tells a very simple story. One team dominated, the other struggled to keep pace, and by the final whistle there was little left to debate. But for Alabama, Mississippi State’s loss revealed something much more important than the final margin. Despite being overwhelmed on the scoreboard, the Bulldogs managed to expose a weakness that Kalen DeBoer and his staff know Alabama cannot afford to overlook as the season moves forward.
Alabama came away with the convincing victory, but DeBoer did not treat Mississippi State as an opponent that simply folded under pressure. Instead, he gave the Bulldogs credit for the way they challenged Alabama in key stretches of the game. That recognition was significant because coaches rarely praise an opponent after a 33-point victory unless they saw something on film that deserves genuine respect.
For DeBoer, the game was not simply about Alabama scoring 56 points. It was about what happened when Mississippi State found ways to put pressure on the Crimson Tide and force them into uncomfortable situations.
That distinction matters.
Alabama has enough talent to overwhelm many opponents. The Crimson Tide can create explosive plays, generate pressure defensively and turn a game into a runaway in a matter of minutes. But against the best teams in college football, talent alone does not always erase fundamental problems. The details become more important, and Mississippi State provided Alabama with several uncomfortable reminders of that reality.
The Bulldogs showed that Alabama can be vulnerable when an opponent refuses to become intimidated by the Crimson Tide’s reputation. Mississippi State continued to compete even after Alabama established control, and that persistence forced Alabama to execute rather than simply rely on momentum.
That may ultimately be the most valuable lesson DeBoer takes from the game.
There is an obvious temptation after a 56–23 victory to focus entirely on the positives. Alabama scored at a high level. The offense produced enough explosive plays to put the game away. The defense created opportunities to swing momentum. The Crimson Tide eventually separated itself from the Bulldogs.
But DeBoer understands that the best teams do not evaluate themselves solely by the final score.
They evaluate how they performed when things did not go according to plan.
Mississippi State exposed moments where Alabama’s execution became less consistent. There were stretches when the Bulldogs were able to find space, sustain drives and make Alabama work harder than the final score might suggest. Those moments may not matter much against an overmatched opponent, but they become a completely different story against an elite team capable of turning a single defensive mistake or offensive breakdown into seven points.
That is where the concern begins.
Alabama cannot afford to allow opponents to consistently find cracks in its defensive structure. A team competing for championships eventually reaches a point where every possession matters. A missed assignment, poor tackling angle or communication breakdown can completely change the direction of a game.
Mississippi State’s success in certain stretches demonstrated that Alabama still has areas that require attention.
DeBoer’s comments also showed that he understands the difference between respecting an opponent and being satisfied with a victory. Giving Mississippi State credit does not mean Alabama played poorly. It means the coaching staff is willing to acknowledge what the Bulldogs did well while using those moments as teaching opportunities.
That approach could prove extremely important.
The Crimson Tide will eventually face opponents with considerably more talent and depth than Mississippi State. Those teams will be capable of exploiting mistakes far more efficiently. If Alabama allows the same weaknesses to appear repeatedly, the consequences will be much greater.
That is why a 56–23 victory can still generate uncomfortable questions inside the program.
The offense may have produced enough points to make those questions easy to ignore, but championship teams cannot simply outscore every problem. At some point, Alabama will encounter a defense capable of slowing its explosive plays. At some point, the Crimson Tide may face an offense that takes advantage of every missed opportunity.
When that happens, Alabama will need to win the smaller battles.
Mississippi State provided a preview of those battles.
There was also something revealing about the Bulldogs’ mentality. Even while trailing significantly, they continued to attack. That forced Alabama to maintain its focus rather than simply cruise through the final quarter. For a coaching staff, those situations can be extremely useful because they reveal which players continue executing when the outcome appears decided.
DeBoer has repeatedly emphasized the importance of improvement, and this is precisely the kind of game from which a team can learn. Alabama does not need to panic after winning 56–23. It needs to study the 23 points Mississippi State scored and understand exactly how they happened.
Were there missed tackles? Were there communication problems? Did Alabama lose leverage? Did the Bulldogs find favorable matchups? Did Alabama become too aggressive in certain situations? Were there moments when players failed to maintain discipline?
Those questions matter more than the final margin.
A 33-point victory can hide problems if coaches only look at the scoreboard. But film does not care about the scoreboard. Film shows every missed assignment, every late reaction and every opportunity an opponent found.
That is likely why DeBoer’s praise of Mississippi State carries more weight than it initially appears.
By acknowledging what the Bulldogs did well, he is also acknowledging what Alabama needs to improve.
And Alabama’s next opponents will certainly be watching.
Every contender studying the Crimson Tide will look for the same thing: weaknesses that can be attacked repeatedly. If Mississippi State found something useful, better teams will attempt to build on it. Alabama’s advantage is that it now has the opportunity to correct those issues before they become more serious.
That is the benefit of winning comfortably while still being challenged.
The Crimson Tide gets to learn without having to pay the ultimate price.
For Alabama fans, that should be the encouraging part of the story. The problems exposed against Mississippi State are correctable. The team did not lose control of the game, and the offense ultimately created far too much for the Bulldogs to handle. Alabama also showed the ability to respond when Mississippi State made plays.
But championship aspirations demand more than simply responding.
They require consistency.
If Alabama can clean up the mistakes exposed in this game, the 56–23 victory could become more valuable than another routine win. It could serve as a warning shot at exactly the right time.
Mississippi State may have walked away with a 33-point loss, but the Bulldogs still managed to give Alabama something it cannot buy with another touchdown: a clear look at where improvement is needed.
Kalen DeBoer knows that the margin between a dominant regular-season victory and a championship defeat can be surprisingly small. Against Mississippi State, Alabama had enough talent and firepower to overcome its imperfections.
Against the best teams on its schedule, Alabama may not have that luxury.
That is why the 56–23 score should not be the only number Alabama remembers.
The real takeaway is what happened before the scoreboard became lopsided.
Mississippi State showed Alabama that even a team it can defeat convincingly may still uncover weaknesses capable of becoming dangerous later. DeBoer gave the Bulldogs credit because they made Alabama confront those weaknesses.
Now the responsibil
ity belongs to the Crimson Tide.
Fix them before someone better does far more damage.
Leave a Reply